It’s not just a Figment of your Imagination & Get Back Charlie Black by Jake Pickering

July 23rd, 2008

“It’s Not Just a Figment of Your Imagination”

Jack Pickeriing

“We don’t want the same old thing. We want something new.” (Senator Barack Obama (Democrat, Illinois).

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain’s chief economic adviser, the former economist & U.S. Senator Phil Gramm (Republican from Texas), was recently interviewed on video by the Moonie-owned Washington Times newspaper, where McCain’s so-called economic expert, Dr. Phil Gramm, gave the following arrogant, dimwitted diagnosis of our nations’s financial downturn: “You’ve heard of a mental depression; this is a mental recession…We’ve sort of become a nation of whiners.”

As usual, the Democratic Party’s 2008 presidential nominee, Senator Barack Obama, responded with wit and wisdom: “America already has one Dr. Phil. We Don’t need another when it comes to the economy…It’s not just a figment of your imagination!…It’s time we had a president who doesn’t deny our problems or blame the American people…”

Dr. Phil Graham, who was the odds-on-favorite to become Treasury Secretary in a potential McCain Administration (until Graham rhetorically reduced the Republican presidential nominee’s election prospects to rubble), was then immediately ‘thrown under -the-bus’ by the Republican Dr. Phil’s long-time friend and political ally John McCain, in a desperate attempt at damage control: “I think Senator Graham would be in serious consideration for Ambassador to Belarus. Although, I’m not sure the citizens of Minsk would welcome that.”

Too little, too late for the 71-year old Senator McCain! As some readers may recall, Arizona’s John McCain was one of the most vocal supporters of Dr. Phil Gramm’s failed campaign for the Republican presidential nomination back in 1996.

In fact. in 1996. then-Senator Phil Gramm proposed many of the very same plutocratic economic policies that are currently being recycled by 2008 Republican nominee John McCain: privatization of Social Security and Medicare; vast giveaways of public land and our dwindling natural resources to multinational oil companies, including destructive oil drilling in national parks and off the coasts of California and Florida; gigantic corporate tax cuts leading to ballooning budget deficits, and of course so-called “free” trade, leading to the loss of tens-of-millions of unionized American manufacturing jobs, all so that ultra-rich corporate executives could see their personal stock portfolios inflated even further, while millions of American families simultaneously continue to sink further into debt just to pay their monthly bills!

And John McCain’s conservative chief economic adviser, Dr. Phil Gramm. has the nerve to call the United States of America “a nation of whiners?” Give me a break!

Contrary to the erroneous claims made by the Republican Party and their surrogates posing as “journalists” in the corporate media, Barack Obama does want to give you a break—a tax break, that is. In fact, if your income is between $37,000 and $66,000, you will receive (on average) an annual federal income tax cut of $1042 under Obama’s plan.

McCain’s miserly campaign only offers those same working families a measly $319 annual tax cut. John McCain, however, does want to reduce the already historically-low corporate tax rate by an ADDITIONAL 30 PERCENT. (As if Exxon Mobil actually needed to fleece any additional money from the pockets of struggling American families.)

Under Senator Obama’s plan, Americans making under $250,000 annually will pay no additional federal income taxes. In fact, senior citizens earning less than $50,000 annually will pay no federal taxes whatsoever, if Obama becomes President.

Senator Obama proposes paying for these tax cuts for working families in a responsible fashion. Instead of the classic Republican Party tactic of running up the national debt and passing the buck to future generations, Obama will offset any potential losses in federal revenue by a necessary—and at this time in America history, an unquestionably justifiable—increase in tax rates for corporations and the ultra-rich. Yes, rich Republicans, it is time for those who have taken so much from the public, to give some of it back. It is time for change.

Fanatic flip-flopper John McCain, however, has again switched political positions on the question of taxes. No doubt, you will recall that McCain was once a vociferous opponent of George W. Bush & Dick Cheney’s reckless, financially irresponsible tax cuts for the rich, but in McCain’s quest to bend-over-backwards for the amusement of the radical right-wing base of the Republican Party, John McCain flip-flopped yet again and now supports making Bush & Cheney’s tax cuts for the rich permanent!

Ironically, as John McCain himself once said, “That’s not change we can believe in.” And, folks, John McCain is not a candidate we can believe in either.

———————————————————————————————-

“Get Back, Charlie Black”

Jake Pickering

“Another successful attack on the United States of America could have devastating consequences.” —Senator John McCain (R-AZ)

John McCain’s chief political strategist Charlie Black recently shared with Fortune Magazine his opinion that Benazir Bhutto’s brutal assassination “helped us.” Additionally, Charlie black also admitted that another orchestrated 9/11-like event on American soil (prior to McCain’s presidential contest in November) “would be a big advantage to him.”

As revealing as Republican Party reptile Charlie Black’s startling coldblooded candor may be, what is more telling is this following partial list of Washington lobbyist Charlie Black’s corporate clientèle: Maxxam Inc. ($430,000), Lockheed Martin ($487,000), General Electric ($680,000), General Motors ($570,000), AT&T ($1,185,000), JP Morgan Chase & Co ($724,000), Phillip Morris ($1,292,500), Rolls Royce ($320,000), Occidential Petroleum (41,650,000), Chevron Texaco ($155,000), Yukos Oil ($155,000), and — in the interest of “free” trade, no doubt— the Columbian Textile & Apparel Industry ($80,000).

Charlie Black has been employed by every Republican presidential campaign since 1972, ans as head of BKSH and Associates, Charlie Black is “one of Washington’s most powerful influence peddlers.” [www.motherjones.com]

Ironically, when Charlie Black’s most recent political client John McCain required a campaign spokesliar to take to the airways to protest the New York Times explosive expose of the 71-year-old Senator McCain’s “relationship” with 31-year-old lobbyist Vicki Iseman, McCain chose lobbyist Charlie Black for the job—proving that though you may never get the truth from a potential President McCain, you are guaranteed to get lots-and-lots of lobbyists!

———————————————————————————————– Read the rest of this entry »

7/4/08 Proving God Doesn’t Exist by James A. Worrell

July 4th, 2008

PROVING GOD DOESN’T EXIST

JAMES A. WORRELL

“Could a being create the fifty billion galaxies, each with two hundred billion stars, and then rejoice in the smell of burning goat flesh?” (Ron Patterson, Internet Infidel)

The burden of proof is always on the one who asserts a proposition as a fact. Religious persons claim there is a god that created and controls the universe and all life. the burden of proof is upon them to prove it. They have never proved it, but instead say that it is a matter of faith. That is, you must accept the belief in god without facts, as faith is the acceptance of things unknown.

I believe there is a remedy for almost any problem. The problem in this case is how to prove whether there is a god or not. Since God is not available for an interview, or to be seen anywhere, and He allegedly resides in heaven or paradise, a place unknown to anyone, it is necessary to find out what connections we have with God.

According to the Bible, our connection to God is through prayer, and none other. Please bear with me while I give you a smattering of some of the prayer promises by Jesus Christ. Here are the verses from the Bible, and I say to all Christians, these are the verses you believe in, and not we skeptics.

1) And Jesus answered and said to them, “Truly I say to you, if you have faith and do not doubt, you will not only do what was done to the fig tree, but if you say to this mountain, ‘Be taken up and cast into the sea,’ it will happen. And all things you ask in prayer, believing, you will receive.” (Matthew 21:22 NAS)

2) “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks, receives; and the one who seeks, finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.” (Matthew 1:7-8 NAB)

3) “Again I say to you, that if two of you agree on earth about anything that they may ask, it shall be done for them by My Father who is in heaven. For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am in their midst.” (Matthew 18:19-20 NAS)

4) “Amen, I say to you, whoever says to this mountain, ‘Be lifted up and thrown into the sea,’ and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it shall be done for him. Therefore I tell you, all that you ask for in prayer, believe that you will receive it and it shall be yours.” (Mark 11:24-25 NAB)

5) “And I tell you, ask and you will receive; seek and you will find; knock and the door will opened to you. For everyone who asks, receives; and the one who seeks, finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.” (Luke 11:9-13 NAB)

6) “And whatever you ask in my name, I will do, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask anything of me in my name, I will do it.” (John 14:13-14 NAB)

7) “If you remain in me and my words remain in you, ask for whatever you want and it will be done for you.” (John 15: 7 NAB)

8) “It was not you who chose me, but I who chose you and appointed you to go and bear fruit that will remain, so that whatever you ask the Father in my name he may give you.” (John 15:16 NAB)

9) “On that day you will not question me about anything. Amen, amen, I say to you, whatever you ask the Father in my name he will give you. Until now you have not asked anything in my name; ask and you will receive, so that your joy may be complete.” (John 16: 23-24 NAB)

10) One of the biggest lies of all is when Jesus said Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth in me, the works that I do shall he do also, and greater works than these shall he do because I go unto my Father.” This lie does not require one to even pray. It says that if you believe you can do greater works than Jesus did. Do you really believe that? If you do, you are delusional or both.

11) “And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak new tongues; they shall take up serpents and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick and they shall recover.” (Mark 16:17-18 KJV) These lies can be easily tested; just pick up a black Mamba snake and see if it shall not hurt you. Or, drink a glass of sulphuric acid and see if it hurts you. Please lay your hands on a terminally ill cancer patient and see if they recover. These are three of Jesus’ biggest lies.

12) “If two of you shall agree on earth as touching anything that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.” (Matthew 18:19).

Dear reader, the thing to observe about these Bible verses is that they are unconditional. Jesus placed no requirements on the person praying except to believe in him. However, the Christian apologists fabricate a huge lie in answering this fact. They say that God will answer your prayers in his own due time. Nowhere in the Bible does it say this. Further, the statement that God will act in his own due time makes a liar out of Jesus’ promises.

As an example, if you were on an airplane that was about to crash into the Pentagon, and as a believer in Christ, you asked God to save you from crashing to death, God would have to act swiftly, and not in his own due time. I am sure there were Christian believers on all four airplanes that crashed on September 11, 2001 asking God to save them. Since He didn’t keep the planes from crashing, and allowed the believers in His promises to crash, that is proof that prayer does not work; that Jesus’ promises are lies; and that there is no god.

Before ending this epistle, I want to point out one of the worst statements Jesus ever made. It is number 10 above. There Jesus says if you are a believer in him, you can do greater miracles then he can. That is correct; it does not even require prayer. Just be a believer and you can turn water into wine; multiply loaves of bread, cure leprosy, drink poison, cast a mountain into the sea, and raise people from the dead. Just think about what you have read. The lies of Jesus are the most preposterous things in the New Testament, and you can test them to see that prayer does not work and there is no Supreme Being to answer them.

Although the burden is on the Christians or other religious believers to prove there is a god, I have demonstrated that their only connection to god—prayer, doesn’t work. I welcome any rebuttals to my proof that there is no god.

——————————————————————————————————————————–

The following includes two articles and 1 letter to the editor from June 23-25

June 23rd, 2008

THE UNIVERSAL LIE OF HISTORY

STEPHEN VAN ECK

It cannot be stated more clearly: The early history of the Catholic Church is a complete fraud.

There is no evidence that Peter was ever in Rome. As a poor substitute the Church offers nothing but pious legend. Such was concocted ex nihilo in order to link the Church to the Apostle whom the Gospels say (Matthew 16:18-19) Jesus founded his Church upon, to whom he gave the keys to the Kingdom.

But Acts places Peter in Jerusalem for practically all of the years up to the time of his alleged martyrdom. And Acts also indicates that he was subordinate to James, who was the actual leader of the Nazoreans.

But somehow Peter was supposed to have been the first Pope, supreme leader of Christendom. And with the urgent notion of Apostolic succession, the Church offers a comprehensive list of all the popes from Peter on down. But for the first three centuries of the Christian Era, these names are virtually meaningless. None of them were actually “Pope”. Maybe most of them were actually Bishops of Rome, but the Bishop of Rome was not then recognized as pre-eminent among all other Bishops. He was first among equals in the West, but in the East was no more important than the Bishops of Antioch, Alexandria, Byzantium or Jerusalem. He was not recognized as having the power to pronounce doctrine binding on the rest of the Church. Both Cyprian and Eusebius report the lament of the laity in the mid 200’s: “in a Catholic Church, there ought to be one Bishop,” which indicates there was not then such an authority.

Real-world evidence shows that for the first three centuries, Bishops were elected by local worshippers, and then ratified by other regional Bishops. They were not appointed by the Pope, as they would be later. Even the Bishop of Rome, the supposed Pope, was popularly elected at first. In 236, Fabian was acclaimed Bishop when a pigeon landed on his head, which was taken as a sign. (The Church, in retrospect, refers to him as Pope.)

Bishops took the initiative to pronounce doctrine applicable to their city and environs, without consulting the Bishop of Rome. Several Church councils were called during the first three centuries to discuss and settle doctrinal dilemmas. They were initiated by a variety of Bishops, not by the Bishop of Rome.

The Council of Nicaea in 325 was a major Church council. This time it was called by the Emperor, not by any Bishop, thus showing the political takeover of Christianity. This council, as well as the councils of Antioch and Elvira, were presided over by Bishop Ossius of Cordova, not by Sylvester, who was supposedly Pope at the time. Ossius had attached himself to Constantine as his trusted aide in ecclesiastical matters. It was Ossius who first announced the Nicene Creed and signed it, after which Constantine’s notaries presented it to the attendees. Ossius was more of a Pope than the man who supposedly was!

So for the first three centuries of the Christian Era, it is not accurate to think that there was a Pope, or even the Catholic Church as such. It is only proper to speak of a Catholic Church after the Emperor Constantine made Christianity the preferred religion. This is the true birth of the Catholic Church, when the Bishop of Rome, with the patronage of the Emperor, known as Pontifex Maximus, eventually became first among equals.

Since the Bishop of Rome only gradually gained recognition and power, it is unclear who the first real Pope was. It might have been Innocent l (401-417) who was the first to claim authority over other Bishops and over Christendom as a whole, and who became the most powerful man in town when the Emperor bailed for Ravenna. Or Leo the Great (440-461) who was officially granted jurisdiction over the Bishops in the West by a decree from Valentinian III. But it was the political alliance with the Roman Empire that created the Roman Catholic Church and the papacy, institutions modeled after imperial administration. Any story to the contrary is the pious fraud of the Roman Church, a necessary buttress to its claim of authority.

—————————————————————————-  

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

THE PANTAGRAPH

WILLIAM FRINSKO

By virtue of his being the Republican Party’s leading candidate for the presidency of the United States, Sen. John McCain’s mental and physical condition will be scrutinized. Voters need this information.

McCain survived three airplane crashes, and he was hit by shrapnel on the USS Forrestal in 1967 when it caught fire and he was forced to dive out of his cockpit. For five and a half years (from 1967 to 1973) he was a prisoner of war in North Vietnam. He was tortured and spent two years in solitary confinement. In 1999 he wrote in his memoir, I had to carefully guard against my fantasies becoming so consuming that they took me to a place in my mind from which I might fail to return.

The term PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder) was not coined until 1980, but McCain has a violent temper that is considered a hallmark sign of mental trauma from war, according to Robert Timberg in his book, John McCain: An American Odyssey.  

McCain also has suffered physical injuries including a broken right knee, broken arms, cracked ribs, and broken teeth. He has undergone four operations for facial cancer.

He and President George W. Bush are sons of successful fathers, and they both try to surpass them in achievement. Oedipal rivalry. Both agreed on the Iraq War that has been waging since 2003, and has exacted a terrible toll on our country; besides, our reputation has suffered. McCain seems to value military might over diplomacy.

Our country needs a change from the failed policies of the past seven-plus years that McCain has supported. There is little likelihood that he would be a leader for positive change, as he lacks the temperament. Sen. McCain should be retired, as he already has suffered enough.

—————————————————————————- 

WAS HILLARY VOTE REALLY AN ANTI-OBAMA VOTE?

WILLIAM HARWOOD

According to voting figures reported by CNBC, all states in which African Americans constitute less than eight percent of the population, and all states in which African Americans make up more than sixteen percent of the population, voted for Barack Obama in the Democratic primaries. Those states with between eight and sixteen percent Black populations voted for Hillary Clinton, in many cases overwhelmingly. Was there a reason for those statistics, or were they sheer coincidence? One possible explanation comes to mind.

Blacks overwhelmingly voted to create the first Black president. That makes sense, since, all else being equal, it is high time a long oppressed minority achieved the ultimate equality of being represented in the White House. And with the white vote split between the first Black and the first woman president, a solid bloc of sixteen percent or more was sufficient to take their candidate over the top.

In those states in which African Americans constitute a large enough proportion of the population to be seen as a self-serving clique, able to further a “me first” agenda due to the lack of unity among Whites. there was a very real fear—strictly in the eyes of the beholders—that a Black administration in Washington would be as self-serving as Black cliques in their home states. Given that either Obama or Clinton would be a history-making president, and all else being equal, that fear triggered a convergence on the candidate who did not appear to be a threat to majority rights. That was Hillary Clinton.

In states with insufficient Blacks for them to wield local power out of all proportion to their numbers, Whites had no reason to fear that voting for a Black individual was tantamount to voting for a Black agenda. Minorities are only feared when first-post-the-post voting splits the majority vote and gives the minority a virtual veto over what are perceived as majority rights. Canadians in recent years have seen the result of such a situation, when the anti-theocracy vote was split three ways between liberals, socialists, and environmentalists, resulting in the theocrats, despite receiving only one-third of the popular vote and being detested and feared by the other two-thirds, winning the largest number of Parliamentary seats and being allowed to form the government. Much the same thing happened to the party of Abraham Lincoln since 1980. Lack of unanimity among the two-thirds of Republicans who are moderate has enabled the theofascist one-third to take over the Party and turn it into a willing puppet of the American Taliban, forcing its human members such a John McCain to kowtow to the mad dog minority or have no chance of being elected.

So does that mean that Democrats who voted against electing a Black president in the primaries will do so again in the the general election? There is  good reason to conclude that it does not. While there was mere suspicion that a Black president might pursue a Black agenda of “reverse discrimination,” there is absolute certainty that a Republican president will pursue the Republicanazi agenda of abolishing the wall of separation between church and state, imposing the religion of the 16 percent fundamentalist Far Right on the majority of 51 percent moderate believers and 33 percent nontheists, and the wars to impose the Bush religion on the rest of the world will continue unabated. A Hispanic president, a Jewish president, a Mormon president, or even an African American president, while disquieting to some voters will be recognized as a far safer and wiser choice than a Republican president.

—————————————————————————- 

6/20/08 Articles on the Bible by biblical scholar Dr. A.J. Mattill

June 20th, 2008

To contact the editor for articles or commentary you may like to post on this site, send an email to: lelandw@toast.net

THE MOST IMPORTANT PASSAGE IN THE BIBLE

A.J. MATTILL, Jr.

What is the most important passage in the Bible? Without a moment’s reflection most Christians would answer John 3:16, For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish but have everlasting life. There was a time when I probably would have agreed, but at this stage of my religious odyssey I would nominate Micah 6:6-8, (6) With what offering shall I come to the Lord and bow myself before the God on high? Shall I come to him with burnt offerings and sacrifice calves a year old? (7) Does the Lord take delight in thousands of sheep or in ten thousand rivers of olive oil? Should I sacrifice to the Lord my first-born child as payment for my terrible sins? (8) The Lord God has told us what is right and what he demands: “Do justice, love kindness, and walk humbly with your God.” Here are two reasons for ranking Micah 6:6-8 as the most important biblical passage.

Reason One.Micah 6:6-8 is the most important passage in the Bible because it repudiates brutal butcher-shop religion/pitiless packinghouse piety/senseless slaughterhouse spirituality. Zillions of calves and sheep and first-born children will not atone for sins. Since Micah 6:7 rejects the sacrifice of one’s first-born for one’s sins, Micah 6:7 nullifies Jesus’ atoning death on the cross (John 3:16), for Jesus was the firstborn child of God (Colossians 1:15). Micah also rejects the teaching of Hebrews 9:22 that no sins can be forgiven unless blood is offered. Thus Micah refutes the brutality, the pitilessness, and the senselessness of religion based on animal and human sacrifices. Anyone who displays a cross is supporting the blood-soaked theology of John 3:16, Hebrews 9:22, and countless other passages.

Reason Two. The second reason why Micah 6:6-8 is the most important passage in the Bible is that Micah 6:6-8 is the basis for a meaningful affirmation. An affirmation is a positive statement which expresses one’s desires and which one repeats to impress it on one’s subconscious mind, which has tremendous power to bring these desires to pass. Here is my nontheistic affirmation inspired by Micah 6:6-8: Today I heed the still, small voice of my sensitized conscience, seasoned experience, and sound reason, and do justice, practice kindness, and walk humbly before the Mystery of the Universe, which is the Tremendous Mystery, the Primal Mystery, and the Cosmic Mystery, which was in the beginning, now is, and evermore shall be, world of Mystery without end. Now let us examine this affirmation.

First of all, what does it mean to do justice? To do justice means to render to everyone that which is his/her due. To do justice means to see that no one suffers wrong, and that everyone is equal before the law.

Second, what does it mean to practice kindness? We practice kindness when we are considerate in our conduct toward plants, animals, and people, causing them no unnecessary harm. To practice kindness means to work for a more humane society which is marked by greater compassion for every sensitive creature. Even small acts of kindness can make a difference for animals and people. Thus I’ll be kind to as many as I can, in all the ways I can, as often as I can, and so long as I can. So many gods, so many creeds,/So many paths that wind and wind,/While just the art of being kind/Is all this sad world needs.—Ella Wheeler Wilcox (1855-1919).

Third, what does it mean to walk humbly before the Mystery of the Universe? To walk humbly before the Mystery of the Universe means to contemplate the Tremendous Mystery. We tremble with awe and astonishment at the sheer magnitude and power of the cosmos and feel so utterly humble, small, and insignificant before the inconceivable size of it all. How instructive is a star,/it can teach us from afar/Just how small each other are.—Poet Piet Hein.

As we continue to walk humbly before the Mystery of the Universe we think our way back to the Primal Mystery. Here we confront the unsolvable mysteries of what was there first, why there was something instead of nothing, and what the source was. Now we feel even humbler, smaller, and more insignificant.

Then as we walk humbly before the Mystery of the Universe, we confront the Cosmic Mystery of why this vast creative and destructive process in which we are immersed creates marvelous things and then violently destroys them or slowly grinds them down. Can we make any sense of such a ruthless process?

The long and short of it is this: The rounded world is fair to see,/Nine times folded in mystery. —Essayist Ralph Waldo Emerson 1803-1882).

—————————————————————————

A STARTLING SHORT STUDY

A. J. MATTILL, Jr.

According to Psalm 82:1b, God pronounced judgment upon the “the gods” (King James Version, Today’s English Version, New American Bible). At least one translation, New American Standard Bible, prefers to say that God “judges in the midst of the rulers.” Already it is obvious that we are dealing with a difficult, enigmatic verse. Hence several interpretations are on the table.

Interpretation One. God calls the gods of other nations before him to judge those gods. According to a conception common to the ancient Near East, a heavenly council of gods rules the world. God stands up in the midst of the council and pronounces judgment on the other gods.

This concept of the heavenly council of gods is also found in Psalms 29:1-2, 58:1, 77:14, 82:1, 86:8, 89:6-8, 95:3, 96:4, 97:7,9, 103:20-21, and 148:1-2. Outside the Psalter, see Genesis 1:26, 3:22, 11:7, 1 Kings 22:19, Job 1:6, and Isaiah 6:8. Thus Today’s English Version renders Psalm 82:1a like this: “God presides in the heavenly council.”

In short, Psalm 82 reflects the transition from belief in a number of gods under the one true God (so also Exodus 20:3, “You shall have no other gods before me”), to a belief in one God only (Isaiah 46:9, “I am God, and there is none else”).

Interpretation Two. God judges human beings who are unjust, wicked rulers and judges, who are called “gods” because they stand in the place of God (Exodus 4:16, 21:6, 22:8). A strong argument against interpretation Two goes like this: “Gods”cannot be human judges because their punishment is to die “like men” (Psalm 82:7), after their divinity has been taken away.

Intrepretation Three. God judges neither gods nor humans but angels. Ultimately the Hebrews abandoned the concept of the heavenly council of lesser gods in heaven and believed that the heavenly host consisted solely of angels.

These three interpretations raise several questions.

Question One. According to the Bible, how many gods are there? We have seen that according to some passages there are many gods. But we’ve also found that according to other passages there is only one God. Should Christians who “stand on the Bible”believe in many gods or only one God?

Question Two. If the Bible cannot be trusted on the all-important matter of the number of gods, how can it be trusted on any matter?

Question Three. Asaph, the traditional author of Psalm 82, violated Cobbett’s Rule: “I speak [write] not only so that I can be understood, but so that I cannot be misunderstood.” We have found out that there are at least three interpretations of Psalm 82. At the most, only one of these interpretations can be the correct understanding of the Psalm. The others are misunderstandings. Since Asaph is so easy to misunderstand, how can he possibly have been a divinely inspired author?

Question Four.In light of this startling short study, it appears highly probable that the Bible is an uninspired writing which cannot be trusted even on theological matters, to say nothing of historical and scientific matters. What a startling discovery! The obscure Asaph has shaken our faith in God and the Bible.

A Comforting Conclusion. Are we than left in a hopeless state of confusion? No, for we can be guided by our own sensitized conscience, seasoned experience, and sound reason. In the words of am old Quaker hymn:

Oh, the Book it may perish

And the Steple may fall

But the light of [conscience, experience, and reason]

will be shining,

At the end of it all.

—————————————————————————-

JOEL’S GOD

A. J. MATTILL, JR.

Joel is a short book of only seventy-three verses. It was probably written about 400 BC/BCE. In chapter two, verse thirteen, Joel the prophet gives us a view of God: God is caring, compassionate, forgiving, gracious, kind, loving, merciful, and patient. These eight attributes of Joel’s God are taken from the King James Version, Revised Standard Version, New American Standard Bible, Today’s English Version, and Contemporary English Version.

Now we ask ourselves: Does the God portrayed in the book of Joel really embody these attributes? To answer this question, we examine four aspects of Joel’s teaching about God.

1. A God of Plagues.Joel’s God sent a terrible invasion of locusts and a devasting drought to Palestine (Joel 2:25): People looked on helpless as their crops were destroyed and seeds died in the dry earth. The cattle bellowed in distress because there was no pasture for them. The sheep also suffered. Wild animals cried out because there was no pasture for them. The sheep also suffered. Wild animals cried out because the streams and rivers had dried up. Locusts ate the plants like fire. Nothing could stop the locusts. They climbed into houses through the windows like thieves. Everyone was terrified (1:16-2:11). Joel’s God is not merciful—he’s a monster! No caring, compassionate God would afflict animals and people so cruelly.

2. A God of the Temple. Joel’s God is the God of the Temple in Jersulem. Joel shows great concern about worship in the Temple. Some scholars regard Joel as a “cultic prophet” that is, a “Temple prophet.” I would describe Joel as a “butcher-shop prophet.”

Joel says, “There is no grain or wine to offer in the Temple; the priests mourn because they have no offerings for the Lord” (1:9, Today’s English version). “Put on sackcloth and weep, you priests who serve at the altar! Go into the Temple and mourn all night! There is no grain or wine to offer your God” (1:13, Today’s English Version). The plagues sent by the Lord had made these offerings impossible.

Here Joel is refering to the daily offerings, as described in Exodus 29:38-41: (38) “Every day for all time to come, sacrifice on the altar two one-year-old lambs. (39) Sacrifice one of the lambs in the morning and the other in the evening. (40) With the first lamb offer two pounds of fine wheat flour mixed with one quart of pure olive oil. Pour out one quart of wine as an offering/ (41) Sacrifice the second lamb in the evening, and offer with it the same amounts of flour, olive oil and wine as in the morning. This is a food offering to me, the Lord, and its odor pleases me” (Today’s English Version). A bloodthirsty God like that cannot be kind and loving.

3. A Man of War. Joel’s God commands: “Prepare war! Let all the men of war draw near. Beat your plowshares into swords, and you pruning hooks into spears”(Joel 3:9-10). Contrast the God of Isaiah 2:4 and Micah 4:3. “They shall beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks.” Joel’s God reversed the classic description of peace found in Isaiah and Micah. Like the God of Exodus 15:3, Joel’s God “is a Man of War.” In my humble opinion, “a Man of War” cannot be caring, compassionate, forgiving, gracious, kind, loving, merciful, and patient.

4. A God of the Jews.In chapter 3, Joel describes the destruction of the Gentiles (”Crush them as grapes are crushed,” 3:13) and the glorification of the Jews (Jerusalem will be a sacred city; foreigners will never conquer it again,” and “the Lord will live on Mount Zion,” 3:17, 21). No way can such a narrow, nationalistic, killer God be caring and compassionate.

Conclusion. Is Joel’s God caring, compassionate, forgiving, gracious, kind, loving, merciful, and patient? I say “No.” What do you say?

—————————————————————————-

5/03/08 There They Go Again (Leland W. Ruble

May 3rd, 2008

To contact me, or if you have an article you want published on this site, send a message to: lelandw@toast.net

Current articles on this post: There They Go Again, (Leland W. Ruble)—President Bush’s Legacy, (Mark Johnson)—Shit, puss, phlegm, and Jesus…Five proofs that humans were not intelligently designed. (William Harwood), Two poems from Frank Ray Davis. Excerpts from the booklet Who Is The “Ruling Class”? by Bernhard Schilli.

There They Go Again

Leland W. Ruble

For me personally, I found no fault in the comments Rev. Wright made during a heated sermon which has been played to excess on radio and TV, by a right-wing media intent on mis-characterizing Barack Obama, as a candidate unfit to be president because of his long-time association with this member of the clergy. The words “God damn America” spoken by Rev. Wright, was an expression of his personal observation that racism in this country is still viable, and remains as the cause for past and present social problems that have existed in the U.S.A since its founding as a Republic. As a matter of fact, in the past, the option of slavery was used as the means to create economic wealth before it was ended after the tragedy of the Civil War. Slavery has ended, but racism has not been entirely eliminated from this society. 

The assumed outrage from the hardcore theofascists in regard to this comment, is just that, a deliberate attempt to create in the minds of voters that Barack Obama is unfit to be president because he maintains the same view of America as the Rev. Wright. It has led to a campaign of propaganda in a deceptive attempt to falsely arouse in the electorate doubt and apprehension. In other words, it’s a sleazy maneuver by theofascist operatives intended to question Obama’s patriotism, or make it seem he is not a genuine American, but has other sinister motives for wanting to be president. It’s a game of ”gotcha” by theofascists determined to do anything to maintain their authoritarian domination over this society. If they can cast doubt in the voters that a candidate—especially one with  liberal inclinations—has associated with someone highly critical of the present direction of government (for instance the Bush/Cheney Regime), they have succeeded. Theofascists will do anything in their power to make a candidate opposed to their imperialistic system of government—their ideology—appear as someone unfit to govern.

I share no empathy with any form of religious dogma, preachers, popes, or self-made prophets, and think too often religion is interjected into political campaigns, because we unfortunately, live in a nation predisposed to embrace candidates who adopt in their proclamations, belief in some form of godism. However, I found this current incident of deliberately making an issue out of a comment spoken in a sermon, a repulsive, disgusting display on the part of the opposing party (Republican theofascists), as a concerted, slimy attempt to hope they are successful in a continuation of the Bush/Cheney regime with John McCain as their nominee. 

As far as the comment made by Rev. Wright, and further comments he has stated publicly in an interview with Bill Moyers, the NACCP, and at a National Press Club conference, his remarks  are not as brainless, nor totally insane as the demented observations of Christian fascists such as the late Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, and John McCain’s spiritual advisors, the Rev. John Hagee, and Rev. Ron Parsley. There is no need here to repeat their crazed observations about the U.S.A, since they have been repeated verbatim countless times in the media. Although not a member of the cloth, theofascist, Ann Coulter’s observations of American culture, also can be described as the rants of a woman whose mind has degenerated to the extent that she can be described as insane as the above mentioned, especially when she makes the comment that America should be totally under the domination of Christian fascism.   

The theofascists who represent the hardcore wing of the Republican Party, have not found it necessary to apologize nor admit that those members of the clergy who have made deranged comments critical of the U.S.A, our society, culture, and people, should shut-up and keep their opinions to themselves. Why? Because these same Christian fascists who have denounced policies of the U.S.A, have for decades enjoyed a close incestuous relationship with the Republican Party, and have, since boy George’s presidency, been catered to and sought for their advice on matters of policy. The Bush/Cheney regime has revealed itself to be one of the most god-influenced administrations in the history of this country.

But, of course, it’s a different story when a liberal member of the god cult is critical of government policies. All hell broke out once the theofascists became informed of the Rev. Wright’s close association with Obama. However, when one of McCain’s religious advisors says something highly critical of society, it’s quietly hushed up and seldom brought to the attention of the pubic. Don’t expect, during their frequent rants on the Fox Network News, or the hundreds of theofascist talk radio hosts who dominate the media of radio programs from one coast to the other, to mention the lunatic comments of Christian fascists.

In order to understand why the theofascists have started a campaign to create doubt in the minds of voters, that Obama is unfit to be president, just listen for awhile to the distorted, frequently insane rhetoric of theofascist talk radio hosts. Don’t listen too long, their commentary is so filled with bombast, deception, lies, hatred, and theofascist propaganda that it can cause one to briefly wonder if one is living in this era or the era of the Third Reich. Sean Hannity and the obviously deranged Rush Limbaugh, are the most depraved shills making an issue out of the comments the Rev. Wright has made. Ever since it became public knowledge of what this member of the clergy has said, these two have daily made it an issue to draw listeners into perceiving Rev. Wright’s comments as “un-American,”  and Obama as a co-conspirator in condemning the U.S.A for its policies and culture. Never once have either of these babbling theofascists ever made an issue out of the even more volatile, absurd remarks made by Falwell, Robertson, Hagee, or Parsley. Because these theofascist wind-bags of religious fundamentalism are in bed with the same ideology that fuels the political right, they completely avoid mentioning their religiously insane comments to their audience of ding-bat hardcore listeners. The main reason they have attacked the comments of the Rev. Wright, is because he is, or was, closely associated with the candidate Barack Obama. Nor did either of these overly paid propagandists for the religious and political hardcore right, ever mention in any of their rants, the recent visit of authoritarian Pope Benedict (Ratzinger) XVI, or the many lunatic proclamations this man has stated in regard toward the condemnation of homosexuality, the prohibition against condoms and sensible birth control, or his less than feeble attempts to make the issue of pedophile priests responsible for sexual crimes against children, and other anti-humanitarian declarations.

This is the same Ratzinger, who allowed Cardinal Bernard Law to avoid prosecution for his role in doing less than nothing in respect to priests who engaged in sexual encounters with youthful members of their congregations. He did this by allowing the Cardinal to flee to Rome, where he is now safely protected from further prosecution in the U.S.A. For a man who imagines himself in communication with a non-existent god, and dresses up the garb of a 13th century potentate, with feet wrapped in gaudy red shoes, and believes in the non-reality of exorcism—demons really do possess people?—and insanely believes that when he prays the prayers are answered, it is hard to imagine how people can continue believing in this nonsense. Like most popes past and present, their main preoccupation is to make sure that their religion of myth, magic illusions, and ritual pomposity remains vibrant and, of course, a huge money making enterprise.

The primary reason Limbaugh and Hannity have daily brought up the issue of the Rev. Wright’s comments, is simple to understand, they do not want a liberal elected as president. Nor do they want to see the era—it is already in a state of disintegration—of Newt Gringrich’s so-called conservative majority lose, and no longer have a prominent voice in the operation of government. They want, as all hardcore theofascists do, a continuation of an imperialist, fundamentalist Christian government, governed by those inclined toward a fascist ideology. Hence the reason for their continual defamation of Barack Obama’s character, is one of many other ways they hope to succeed in casting mistrust in the minds of voters over the false issue that he is not American enough to be president. They know that whether it’s Clinton or Obama, if elected, they will most certainly overturn the gains made by the theofascists since the illegal election of Bush/Cheney.

Anyone can see the obvious, that this entire issue has nothing to do with the economy, the war, or the horrific mess  the Bush/Cheney regime has created. It has to do with creating the false suspicion that because of Obama’s past relationship with the Rev. Wright, he is therefore unfit to be president. Yet, at the same time the hardcore theofascists have no apprehension over the fact that McCain, supported enthusiastically by lunatic members of the clergy, is because of repulsive comments they’ve made regarding this country, still highly qualified to be president.

Not to be left out of this picture is the Fox “News” channel, which is mainly a propaganda network devoted to hosting the views of hardcore theofascist who are avid supporters of an ideology responsible for the appalling mess caused by the incompetent leadership of Bush/Cheney. Of course, they will occasionally interview a liberal, but latter they will spin his/her comments as a means to distort the reality of what they stated. This network has also, time and again, made an issue out of the comments of the Rev. Wright. Distort the issue. Make its audience  believe there is something sinister in Obama’s association with Rev. Wright, and through the deception of televised propaganda, some of their listeners will end up believing the absurdities this network espouses as a means to convert their listeners into dumbed-down, god-enthused supporters of a theofascist ideology.

In closing, it is not my desire that any politician who views a god as a realistic sky dictator, rather than as an unknown, impossible concept, should be, if he or she intends to promote their beliefs in this absurdity, be elected to any office. However, if the choice is between a radical, warmongering candidate who closely identifies with the policies of the man presently occupying the White house, and a man or woman who does not intend to promote their beliefs—continue the obscene, unconstitutional practice of giving millions of taxpayer money toward the support of fundamentalist religious establishments—then if I do vote, I’ll most certainly vote for someone who is the complete opposite of a Bush/Cheney clone.

————————————–

President Bush’s Legacy

Mark Johnson

Concerning the recent U.S. federal government taxpayer rebates.

The U.S. federal government will rebate 150 billion dollars to taxpayers. These monies are intended to stimulate the economy. Most people will use this rebate to pay down debt, and nor purchase consumer goods. This will not stimulate the economy.

The federal government had to borrow the money for the rebate from countries such as China and Saudi Arabia. This federal government is currently running a half-trillion dollar deficit. As a people, not only do we not have the courage to tax ourselves to pay for governmental programs and services we go to the world with a beggars cup to borrow money to give ourselves tax rebates.

The last eight years the Republicans doubled the size of the federal government, and tripled the national debt to 10 trillion dollars. The Democrats recently won control of the federal legislative branches. Did they stop the war in Iraq? Eliminate the deficits? No. both parties are corrupt and have reneged on their principles.

The U.S. voters could easily turn both parties out of power, but will not. Don’t like the corruption, lies and deceit within our government? Look in the mirror.

Concerning the recent surge into Basra, the violence in Iraq is re-escalating and the various factions are tearing at each other’s throats again.

After five years, half a trillion dollars and an Iraqi army and police force that are supposedly reconstituted, why was a surge of 50,000 U.S. troops even required? Why has the reconstituted Iraqi army and police force been incapable of fighting on their own initiative? The Iraqi army and police forces have been heavily infiltrated with Shiite militias. They are not going to fight against their brothers, cousins and fellow Shiites. This is very similar to what happened at the end of the Vietnam War and is why the U.S. will lose the war in Iraq.

Wars do three primary things. They debase a nation’s currency, turn honest men into liars and induce inflation. We have had the first two and the third is well on its way.

President Bush’s legacy will be one of failed foreign wars, $10 trillion of debt, massive budgetary deficits and economic recession. The only thing worse are the Republicans that turn a blind eye to the above. (Mark Johnson, POB 602, Nine Miles Falls, WA 99026)

——————————————————-

Shit, puss, snot, phlegm, and Jesus

 Five proofs that humans were not intelligently designed

   William Harwood

Lenny Bruce once informed a San Francisco audience, “I’m going to say the dirtiest word in the English language.” After a pregnant pause, he said, “Snot!” He then continued, “You thought I was going to say ‘fuck.’ But fuck is not dirty. Fuck means love. Fucking is the highest form of love. Well, I love my audience, so fuck you! As for those cops waiting to arrest me: Unfuck them!” Then he was arrested—but not for saying “snot.”

Whether snot is in fact dirtier than shit depends on the eye of the beholder. Snot befouls the face, as shit does not. And most people would be no more inclined to eat snot than to eat shit. As for phlegm and puss, most people eliminate both as soon as they make their presence felt. If an intelligent designer created any of the foregoing, then the kindest explanation is that it was drunk at the time. Or perhaps it was a sadist that got its jollies by inflicting pain and discomfort on sentient beings. But the Occam’s razor explanation is that it had a shit fetish. One thing is certain. If an omniscient designer of the universe exists, then it indubitably created shit, piss, snot, and phlegm. Could such a designer be considered intelligent? And could a designer less competent than a first-year engineering student have created even something as straightforwardas an arsehole? The more prudent apologists for religion ignore those questions in the hope that they can make them go away. The truly feebleminded rationalize that their designer has legitimate reasons for its caprices, comprehensible only to itself.

Jesus likewise was an obscenity that no god in its right mind would have designed. Unless Josephus and five centuries of Christian apologists who accepted his description of Jesus as accurate were all wrong, Jesus was a hunchbacked dwarf.¹ That is not to Jesus’ discredit, any more than having black skin or being a thalidomide mutation would be a discredit. But it says something about a designer who, if believers in such a designer are right, designed Jesus to be its spokesman and King of the Jews. Admittedly other kings have been runts. Charles l was never taller than 5 ft. 2 in, and a head shorter than that after Oliver Cromwell was finished with him. But, in a culture that regarded tallness as a prequisite for a king (e.g., King Saul), would an omnipotent designer have created a king like Jesus, whom Celsus described as, “subject to such numerous and considerable imperfections”?²

Jesus was also a psychopath who believed that, even though the prophesied Anointed One who was to reestablish Jewish independence was to be descended from King David³, as Jesus acknowledged he was not³³, he was nevertheless the Anointed One. Would an intelligent designer have created or even adopted such a nut case, even if he had not been a cross between Quasimodo and Rumpelstiltskin? And would a person specifically created to be the designer’s mouthpiece have preached a sermon³³³ that can be summarized, “Cheat those who are no longer useful to you, and use the stolen money to bribe those who are in a position to do you good”? The Mafia, Halliburton, and the Bush Taliban practice such a philosophy. But when Ronald Reagan did so, only “plausible deniability” kept him from being impeached and appropriately punished.

No intelligent designer whose rationality exceeded that of Gaius Caligula would have created Jesus. And no intelligent designer whose moral evolution exceeded that of the Marquis deSade would have created shit, puss, snot or phlegm, not to mention piss and menstruation. Since those “creations” observably exist, it follows that an intelligent designer capable of eliminating them does not exist. One can only ask what believers in a “God” capable of such atrocities need with a devil.

1 Halosis, quoted by Robert Eisler, Jesus and John the Baptist, p. 467.

2 Origen, Contra Celsum, ch. 59.

3 John 7:42

33 Mark 12:35-37

333 Luke 16:1-9

————————————————

PRAYER OF FREEDOM

Frank Ray Davis 

Our father who art in Heaven high,

keep on baking pies in the sky

for eating in the sweet bye ‘n bye.

But let us human beings be,

free to bumble, stumble, maybe

even sometimes flat-out fall,

but free to grow, develop tall,

with progress shared and love the means,

without blood-sucking poverty.

Call off your dogs in somber gown:

We make enough goofs on our own.

—————————————–

THE POWER OF PRAYER

FRANK RAY DAVIS

“God helps those who help themselves”. —Folk wisdom

Something needed, craved—it pleaseth thee?

Then pray plumb hard and dilligently.

But YOU will make it happen

or it just won’t come home rappin’,

What though you catch a case of Housemaid’s Knee

————————————-

The following are excerpts are from the booklet, Who Is The “Ruling Class”?,  by Bernhard Schilli, published by AHRIMAN - INTERNATIONAL ISBN 3-89484-808-1, 92 pages, US $4, www.ahriman.com Please check out other published books of interest to freethinkers, atheists and humanists.

…Religion serves nearly as well in the intellectual disorientation of its victims as television does, and all that fuss about Popper for the educated (or rather self-conceited) would soon dwindle without this basis, would fall in the hail of unprejudiced logical thoughts and fearless observations. On the other hand, the Church, whose task is the spreading and standardization of religion, could at present no less exist than the ruling class itself without the support of the press; it gets this support, of course, because it is useful for the ruling class in a fundamental and reliable manner, and it gets a great lot of the most exorbitant privileges on top of that; but even those privileges, extras and payments of billions, really outrageous to the utmost, are of much less use to the Church than the sympathy of the media, their ballyhoo and their pseudo-criticism. (p.91)

(4) Before continuing these intellectual experiments, we should consider what is probably the second most important instrument of the ruling class, which at the same time is a true part of it and in importance is only surpassed by the media, but not in the least by the cartel parties or even the judiciary: The Church or rather, to say it correctly, the religious communities privileged by the Hitler Concordate their counterparts outside Germany. Among then the Catholic Church stands by far supreme among the others because of its international organization, of the excellent training of its singularly homogeneous staff of functionaries, who, due to celibacy, are of an unimpeded loyalty, of its properties, which surpass those of anybody else, and of the exterritoriality or rather sovereignty of its headquarters. After long and for the church painful processes of transformation out of its feudalist past, which must have seemed like a Golden Age to its functionaries, it has improved a lot and developed after World War ll, at the latest, to be the largest capitalist company in the world, which no longer needs to be envious even of its former feudal incumbents from the heyday of feudalist society. (pages 79-80)  

———————————

 

 

 

FREETHOUGHT PERSPECTIVE

March 31st, 2008

 

For those who wish to contact me by e-mail: lelandw@toast.net by snail mail: Leland W. Ruble,  833 Orchard St. Toledo, OH 43609   Scroll down to read the articles.

 To read recently posted articles click page on the right.

April 6/08 

THE PSEUDOSCIENCE HALL OF INFAMY: WORTHY INDUCTEES

BY WILLIAM HARWOOD

The literal meaning of science is “knowledge,” from the Latin, scientia. (Omniscience means “knowledge of everything.”) Idiomatically, science today means both the sum total of human knowledge obtained by scientific experimentation and observation, and the methodology used to obtain such knowledge. Pseudoscience is pseudo-knowledge and the pseudoscientific methodology used to derive such pseudo-knowledge.

All alleged knowledge can be divided into three categories: science, pseudoscience, and fantasy. Validly obtained information is science. Information obtained by an invalid methodology posing as scientific is pseudoscience. Information attributed to a metaphysical source that cannot be scientifically tested is fantasy. The postulation that the universe began with a Big Bang is science. The postulation that the universe was created by a god is fantasy. The postulation that a god has revealed its existence is pseudoscience, since all such claims have been traced to the same “sacred” books that also assure their readers that the earth is flat.

The biblical claim that the universe is less than 10,000 years old is pseudoscience, since it is incompatible with facts known from legitimate science. The biblical claim that a man rose from the dead is pseudoscience, since the only testimony for such a violation of the laws of biophysics is the same book that dates the origin of the universe 15 billion years later than it actually occurred. The belief that humans and apes evolved from a common ancestor because a god so decreed is fantasy. The belief that humans and apes did not evolve from a common ancestor is pseudoscience, since a comparision of human and ape DNA establishes common ancestry beyond sane dispute. 

Religion per se is fantasy. But every one of humankind’s 10,000 or more religions incorporates  elements of fully falsified pseudoscience. A religion that did not could have no “sacred” writings that could be tested and falsified. No such religion exists. 

The following list of candidates for a pseudoscience hall of infamy is limited to individuals and disiplines that continue to have some degree of popular support. Jeremy Rifkin is included because as recently as 2007 he was cited by news media as an “expert,” even though he does not have even have an undergraduate degree in any science. The Jupiter Effect is not included because it prophesied specific consequences of a forthcoming alignment of planets, and it is now known that those consequences did not occur. The Jupiter Effect was pseudoscience when it was proposed, since no astrophysicist took it seriously, and it violated the Prime Directive of science: First, peddle no bullshit. It is now a relic of the discredited past.

Sheik Abdel-Aziz ibn Baaz:- Saudi Arabia’s supreme religious authority, who wrote, “The earth is flat, and anyone who disputes this claim is an atheist who deserves to be punished.”

Alcoholics Anonymous:- propaganda agency of the god hoax that tries to wean drunks from the bottle by replacing the mind crippling opiate of alcohol with the even more mind crippling opiate of religion.

Alternative medicine:- euphemism for various forms of pseudoscientific therapy that continue to find gullible believers who think, post hoc, propter hoc, that because an alleged treatment was followed by an alleviation of a medical problem, that the treatment  caused the alleviation. In fact 80 percent of all ailments heal spontaneously with no treatment whatsoever. Among the various quack therapies that claim to be alternative are acupuncture, chiropractic, faith healing, herbal medicine, homeopathy, naturopathy, osteopathy, psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, and therapeutic touch, all of which have the same 80 percent cure rate as would have happened without the pretended “treatment.”

Armageddon:- The authors of chapters 5 to 19 of the Book of Revelation, writing between July and August, 70 CE, prophesied that the Jewish-Roman War currently in progress would end with a Jewish victory in a final battle to take place at har Megiddo, north of Jerusalem. In fact the final battle took place at Masada, south of Jerusalem, and the Jews lost. Since the scientific discipline of documentary analysis has established that continuing belief in Armageddon as a future event stems from an incompetent interpretation of an already failed prophecy, Armageddon beliefs constitute falsified pseudoscience rather than untestable fantasy.

Dan Aykroyd:- actor and disinformation peddler responsible for the television series, Psi Factor: Chronicles of the Pananormal, that passed off imaginative fairy tales as true stories from the case files of a pretended government agency called Office of Scientific Research. No such agency ever existed. Aykroyd was the recipient of the Council for Media Integrity’s first Snuffed Candle award, presented by “encouraging credulity, presenting pseudoscience as genuine, and contributing to the public’s lack of understanding of the methods of scientific inquiry.”

Ellen Bass:- author of Courage to Heal, a book that destroyed hundreds of innocent lives by pretending that fantasies of sexual abuse put into the minds of patients by self-styled “therapists” were “recovered memories” of events that in reality had never happened, Despite the awarding of damages in the millions of dollars against therapists whose patients had driven accused caregivers to suicide and otherwise disrupted families, Bass’s vicious pack of lies is still in print, and pseudomedical humbugs are still deluding gullible patients into fantizing what “therapists” tell them, and then believing that the fantasies are “recovered memories.” All allegedly ”recovered” memories are false memories.

Michael Behe:- author of a book touting Intelligent Design, a euphemism for “God,” for the purpose of passing off religion as science. Courts have consistently ruled that Intelligent Design is pseudoscience, and attempts to teach it in science classes are a violation of the First Amendment’s prohibition of any “law respecting an establishment of religion.” Since Behe continues to argue for the legitimacy of Intelligent Design, that makes him a worthy candidate for the Pseudoscience Hall of Infamy, even though his inability to grasp that his pseudoscience has been annihilated raises the possibility that he really belongs in an institution for the rationally challenged.

Charles Berlitz:- author of several books peddling superstitious hogwash as nonfiction. The crash of a spy ballon at Roswell, New Mexico, had long disappeared from the public consciousnees, due to publication of the reality that the crashed ballon was not a spaceship containing dead aliens. Berlitz, confident that no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of conspiracy theorists, revived the Roswell fantasy with a book filled with disinformation that he knew perfectly well was a pack of lies. He also in effect created the ”Burmuda Triangle” by publishing disinformation that concealed the reality that no higher percentage of aircraft have disappeared in the alleged triangle than in any other equally large area of deep water. Berlitz has rightly been described as the Barnum of bullshit.

Bermuda Triangle:-  pseudoscientific name attached to an area of the Atlantic Ocean for the sole purpose  of creating a mystery where none exists. When all sinkings attributed to the “Triangle” are added together, as was done in a BBC documentary in the 1970s, it becomes evident that “Bermuda Triangle” is simply another name for the Atlantic Ocean.

Morey Bernstein:- author who capitalized on the willingness of persons who either believe they are hypnotized or are pretending to be hypnotized, so say whatever the hypnotist wants to hear. By instructing an allegedly hypnotized woman named Virginia Tighe to think back to a time and another place, he manipulated her into describing an alleged past life in which she was a nineteenth-century Irishwoman named “Bridey Murphy.” Tighe has since acknowledged that she has no belief in reincarnation, and borrowed the name, Bridey Murphy, from a woman who lived in her neighborhood in Chicago. While Tighe’s fantasy contained no demonstrably false information that proved she was fantasizing, later claims of past-life memories solicited under alleged hypnosis have been riddled with statements proven to be inaccurate.

George W. Bush:- possibly the most superstitious, scientifically illiterate, self deluded president America has ever had. Bush told an Israeli newspaper that “God” had instructed him to wage his wars of personal glorification. As Thomas Szasz commented, “When you talk to God, you are praying. When God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.”

Chris Carter:- scientifically illiterate ignoramus who created and wrote many scripts for The X Files, a science fiction television series about alleged alien encounters. As science fiction, such a series would have been legitimate. But Carter, because he is either a lying prostitute or a scientifically illiterate ignoramus, salted various episodes with dialogue that implied that his fantasy story lines had a factual basis.

Carlos Castaneda:- hoaxer who passed off pseudoscientific fantasy as anthropology, and so fooled gullible professors at UCLA’s antropology department into granting him a Ph.D. that it still has not been revoked. Reviewer Richard de Mille identified Castaneda as a “former hoaxer” — for Castaneda is now telling tales with such reckless abandon that reasonable men (male or female) will not believe he is trying to deceive anyone.”  

Ann Coulter;- fanatic propagandist for the pseudoscientific hypothesis that women are so intrinsically inferior to men that they should not be allowed to vote. While Coulter has all the appearance of being a caricature invented by liberals to put into her mouth Republicanazi doctrines so insane that  she will discredit the entire Religious Right (e.g., preventing women from voting will prevent a democrat from ever being elected President), there is sufficient evidence to conclude that she is a real person and is really the epitome of absolute evil that her writings reveal.

Rosemary Crossley:- inventor of the “facilitated communication” delusion, in which self-styled facilitators manipulate the fingers of an autistic or retarded person into punching words on a keyboard, and deluding themselves that the patient rather than the facilitator is the author of the typed message. FC has been totally discredited. When a patient was shown a picture and asked  to describe it, and the facilitator was shown a different picture that she was deceived into believing was the same picture, the typed message described the picture shown to the facilitator, even though the patient had not seen that picture. Crossley’s institution continues to tout facilitated communication as a legitimate means of communicating with the developmentally handicapped, even though she has been made aware of the falsifying evidence.

Tom Cruise:- brain amputee who was conned into becoming a shill for the confidence swindle that is fleecing him, appearing on television as a propagandist for the pseudoscientific fantasy of Scientology.

Eric von Daniken:- crank and humbug (it is possible to be both) who authored several books, starting with Chariots of the Gods, postulating that ancient gods such as Zeus and Apollo were astronauts from an alien star system. While von Daniken’s  earliest books appear to propound a theory that he really believed, publishers eventually rejected his last offerings after it was discovered that his most recent books had been centered on alleged artifacts that had in fact been manufactured to his specifications.

Stockwell Day:- Canadian theofascist politician whose belief that the Christian bible is literal truth, and that dinosaurs coexisted with humans until they drowned in Noah’s flood 5,000 years ago, caused one commentator to remark that, “Day thinks the Flintones is a documentary.”

William Dembski:- brain amputee who knows perfectly well that “intelligent design” is religion posing as science, but who cannot get it through his head that the I.D. claims he continues to tout in his books have been shown to stem from a totally incompetent interpretation of the archaeological evidence that the human body was not intelligently designed, and that humans and all other animals did evolve from common ancestors.

John Dewey:- daydreamer whose “progressive education” theories opened the door for the teaching of pseudoscience in schools, on the ground that pupils should be allowed to decide for themselves whether they wanted to learn anything. “Progressive education,” combined with the takeover of much of American society by the Christian Taliban, has led to a situation in which a majority of Americans believe that the universe is less than 10,000 years old.

Allison DuBois:- lying humbug whose masturbation fantasies became the basis for a television series called Medium. When DuBois’s claims to have aided law enforcement agencies were shown to be unmitigated lies, NBC removed such claims from its website–but it went ahead and broadcast the series because the network’s programmers were uneducated morons who refused to be told that Dubois’s alleged psychic powers do not exist. There is no such thing as a “medium.”

Bob Dylan:- folksinger who converted from Judaism to Christianity. Since switching from a mythology that cannot be falsified without simultaneously falsifying Christianity, to a mythology that can be falsified without falsifying Judaism, is logically absurd, it is a reasonable assumption that all such conversions, including Dylan’s stem from social and economic considerations. Any change of belief not based on evidence that at least appears to be scientifically valid is pseudoscience.  

Mary Baker Eddy:- hypochondriac who became a patient and then assistant to mesmerist Phineas Quimby. After Quimby’s death, Eddy continued to practice Quimby’s form of placebo talk therapy, but changed its name to “divine healing.” She called her final hodgepodge of mesmerism, mysticism, and masturbation fantasies by the oxymoronic name of “Christian Science.” Eddy’s son tried to have her declared mentally incompetent but, even though she was observably not of a sound mind–and even taught that the human body does not exist–a court ruled that she was sufficiently rational to be allowed to bequeath her property as she wished. The earliest version of Science and Health, which Eddy published under her own name, was an expansion of a manuscript by Quimby. The current version has undergone so much reediting that it has the appearance of being written by someone with more than a grade school education.

Milton Erickson:- medical hypnotist who, in refereed articles in medical journals, claimed to have achieved results far exceeding those of any other hypnotist, past or present, results that even believers in hypnotism acknowledge to be impossible. Erickson’s most preposterous claim was that he had simply looked at a member of an audience to whom he was lecturing and, by thinking what he wanted the subject to do, “hypnotized’ him into walking onto the stage and carrying out the act Erickson had mentally put into his mind. For Erickson’s published articles to be anything but unmitigated lies, first hypnotism would have to exist (it does not), and second mental telepathy/extra sensory perception would have to exist (it does not).

Hans Eysenck:- to quote an article by Martin Gardner in Discover (Oct. 1982), “Imagine that you are reading a book, by an eminent British astronomer, called Flat Earth: Science or Superstition? You find that the first three-fourths of the volume marshals impressive evidence against flatness, then the rest of the book proves that the earth is shaped like the Great Pyramid.” Gardner then goes on to explain that Hans Eysenck’s book, Astrology: Science or Superstition, begins with nine chapters that give all the reasons why traditional astrology is humbug, then in two remaining chapters champions a new astrology concocted by French nut job Michel Gauquelin. Even before his death, Gauquelin was exposed as a practioner of fraudulent methodology, choosing for publication only those statistics that supported his theory and ignoring those that refuted  it. Gauquelin was a pseudoscientist, and Eysenck was a pseudoscientist.

FBI:- agency run by scientifically illiterate unteachables who cannot grasp that there is no such thing as a lie detector, and polygraphs are only marginally more reliable than tossing a coin, “heads” for truth and “tails” for lie.

FOX News:- propaganda ministry of the Republicanazi Gestapo, that promotes Republicanazi religion as science.

Eileen Franklin:- inventor of the “recovered memory” hoax. When Franklin claimed to have suddenly remembered witnessing her father rape and strangle a child twenty years earlier, the father was convicted in the absence of any substantiating testimony whatsoever. The conviction was overturned when it was ascertained that every detail the daughter gave police had been published in newspapers to which she had access. Nonetheless “recovered memory” was accepted as a legitimate phenomenon by psychoquacks, and hundreds of innocent caregivers were accused of sexual molestation on the basis of fantasies put into their minds by self-sytled therapists.

Sigmund Freud:- originator of the psychoanalysis scam that all but unteachables now recognize as serving no function except curing patients of hypertrophied wallets. 

John Fuller:- author of Ghost of Flight 401, a fantasy novel that the crew of flight 401 have repudiated as having no factual basis whatsoever. Fuller also wrote books endorsing psychic surgery and UFOs. Since at least one of his books has been shown to be a product of his imagination, the possibility that he is a deluded crank rather than a lying humbug can be dismissed.

Uri Geller:- humbug who passes off conjuring tricks as a “psychic power” that he certainly knows he does not have and almost certainly knows does not exist.

Mel Gibson:- neo-Nazi pusher of a neo-Catholic superstition, who preaches that the Vatican is infallible when it predestines all non-Catholics to hell, but diabolic when it refuses to canonize Gibson’s even more psychotic father, and appoints popes who permit masses to be conducted in languages other than the Latin that is the only language Gibson’s slow-learner god understands. Gibson is an embrarrassment to primates.

God:- the ultimate pseudoscientist, a literary creation whose official biography shows him teaching that the earth is a flat disk at the center of the universe, the sky is a solid crystal dome to which the sun, moon and stars are attached, snakes and donkeys can talk, and the universe is less than 7,000 years old. God is also the most sadistic, evil, insane serial killer in all fiction.

Stephen Jay Gould:- creator of the pseudoscientific delusion he called NOMA. Gould argued that religion and science are Non-Overlapping Magisteria that are not interrelated and therefore not mutually exclusive. While religion’s methaphysical claims, such as the dogma that a god created the universe, cannot be subjected to scientific investigation, critical elements of religion have been tested and falsified, such as the age of the universe, the shape of the earh, the nature of the sky, and the origin of species. But Gould’s most incredible claim, the one that  destroyed his reputation as a legitimate scientist that he had spent a lifetime establishing, was his delusion that morality fell within the Magisterium of religion–in other words, if a religion says that eating meat on Friday, or going outside without a turban, is immoral, then it is immoral. Logic, a scientific discipline, says that immorality means the unnecessary hurting of a nonconsenting victim, and nothing but that.

Ernst Gräfenburg:- pseudoscientist who announced the discovery of a center of erotic stimulation inside the vagina that came to be called the Gräfenberg spot or G spot. It is now generally conceded that the inside of a vagina is no more sensitive to erotic stimulation than a clipped toenail. The “G spot” does not exist.

Billy Graham:- backwoods hillbilly who believes that morality is whatever a fantasy novel says it is. Graham is on record as favoring the execution of persons who engage in the victimless, non-procreational sexual recreation with a non-spouse that he defines as “adultery,” even though the authors of the fantasy novel from which he takes his beliefs defined adultery as the robbing of a fellow Jew of his right to pass on his inheritance to his biological heirs by fraudulently impregnating his wife.

Mary Hart:- notorious pusher of pseudoscience who is either a scientifically illiterate ignoramus who has no awareness that psychics and mediums are swindling humbugs, or a prostitute who is willing to peddle whatever lie will boost the ratings on which her income depends. Either way, she is a worthy inductee into the Pseudoscience Hall of Infamy.

Charlton Heston:- brain amputee who believed that the Wild West, when anyone was allowed to own devices that had no function except homicide, should not be allowed to disappear. Like virtually all moral retards, Heston had no ability to distinguish the pseudoscience of religion from reality. 

J. Edgar Hoover:- believer in the pseudoscientific theory that races are genetically unequel, whose thought police hounded actress Jean Seberg to death for marrying a black man. Hoover likewise encouraged the persecution of homosexuals–except himself and his longtime lover, of course.

Bud Hopkins:- author of Intruders, a fantasy novel posing as an autobiography, describing his alleged abduction by humanoid aliens. Unlike Whitley Strieber, Hopkins did not couch his lies as vague memories that could conceivably have been dreams. While Strieber took steps to avoid being identified as a conscious liar (which in fact he was), Hopkins had too much contempt for the suckers willing to swallow his fairy tales to bother doing likewise.

Fred Hoyle:- astronomer who carried  pseudoscience to what may be its ultimate limit, declaring that the existence of a creator of the universe can be established by mathematics, with a probability greater than 10 to the 40,000th power. He got the “steady state” universe wrong too.

L. Ron. Hubbard:- inventor of the Scientology confidence swindle, who told science fiction editor John Campbell that he wanted to start a religon, “because that’s where the money is.” Hubbard showed his contempt for the suckers capable of taking his science fiction seriously by naming the planet from which aliens allegedly first brought humans to earth, “Arslycus.”

Mike Huckabee:- Republican presidential candidate in 2008 who ran on a platform of being a believer in the literal truth of his evangelical supporters’ bible, including its claim that the universe is flat. Huckabee was too obviously a fruitcake even for the averge Republican bible-thumper.

J. Allen Hynek:- the only astronomer associated with Project Blue Book, the ten-year study of UFO reports by the US Air Force, who failed to concur with the study’s final recomendation that no further research be funded because there was nothing there to research. Hynek’s inability to reach conclusions  compatible with the evidence led him to publish an endorsement of the reality of UFOs in Technology Review, and to provide a spurious respectibility to Steven Spielberg’s scientifically illiterate propaganda movie named for a concept Hynek invented, Close Encounters   of the Third Kind.

Intelligence Quotient:- measure of a puzzle-solving skill passed off as a measure of intelligence. Competing I.Q. tests utilize different standard deviations, so that an I.Q. of 130 on one scale is equal to 148 on a different scale. And since no I.Q. test can measure a score above four standard deviations, alleged scores above 164 on the Stanford Binet scale are propagandistic guesses. A high I.Q. score is no indication of an individual’s ability to engage in rational human thought. As a former member of Mensa concluded, “Just because someone is intelligent, that doesn’t mean that he’s not stupid.”

David Irving:- pseudo-historian who initially argued that, since no surviving documents showed Hitler authorizing the Final Solution, it must have been carried out without his knowledge. Irving later changed his position and declared that there never was a “Holocaust,” and that the hundreds of thousands of death camp survivors were all liars who perpetrated a successful decades-long hoax without a single one ever breaking ranks and admitting that they made it up. 

Andy Kaufman:- gullible believer in the confidence swindle of  “psychic surgery,” who allowed his cancer to be “treated” by a conjurer posing as a surgeon, and rejected the legitimate medical treatment that may have saved him or at least prolonged his life. Kaufman is now the poster boy for suicide through ignorance.

C. S. Lewis:- author of children’s literature whose books crossed the line separating delighful fantasy such as Harry Potter and Alice in Wonderland from pseudoscience, by manipulating his juvenile readers into believing that biblical fairy tales have more reality than those of Hans Anderson or the Brothers  Grimm.

David Letterman:- intellectually challenged ignoramus who invited astrologer Jeanne Dixon to appear on his late-night interview program. When she threatened to put a hex on him if he failed to show butt-kissing respect, instead of demanding that she defend her pseudoscientific swindle, he appeared to be terrified that she could do it.

Percival Lowell:- astronomer who, in the mistaken belief that the canali (Italian for “channels”) Giovanni Schiaparelli thought he saw on the surface of Mars meant “canals,” aimed his own telescope at Mars and, when he convinced himself that he also could see “canals,” drew a detailed map of what he imagined that he saw even though it is now known that Martian canals do not exist and never did exist.

Lucia dos Santos:- co-creator of the fairy tale that the Catholic goddess Mary spoke to three children at Fatima, Portugal, and gave to them information about the future. In 2000 CE, when Lucia was safely ensconced in a convent from which no nun had ever escaped, the Vatican published a document allegedly written by Lucia, so inaccurate that the claim that it foretold the attempted assassination of Pope Wojtyla could only have been taken seriously by the intellectually challenged. Now that Lucia is safely dead and can never reveal that her tale was a practical joke, it is just a matter of time before the Catholic Church deifies/canonizes (same thing) her.

John Mack:- psychoquack who published a book authenticating alien abductions in the belief that his patients’ masturbation fantasies must be true, because he would have known if they were lying. Mack maintained that fatuous delusion even after one of his patients informed a CSICOP convention that she had fed him a pack of lies for the specific purpose of determining whether he used any valid methodology to determine whether his patients were simply telling him what he wanted to hear.

Shirley McLaine:- high priestess of pseudoscience whose books on reincarnation and “channeling,” helped revived the long discredited “spiritualism” hoax and helped part thousands of new marks from millions of dollars. While MacLaine was originally the gullible victim of confidence swindler A. Z. Knight, MacLaine became such a prolific pusher of the channeling scam that her place in the Pseudoscience Hall of Infamy is well deserved.

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi:- confidence swindler whose “transcendental meditation” scam has fleeced suckers of more than $5 BILLION. The Maharishi’s disciples seriously believe that he has achieved such violations of  the laws of physics–and can teach them to do so–as “yogic flying,” walking on water, leviatation, astral projection, and making themselves invisible. If P.T. barnum had even a small gaggle of Maharishi marks to sucker, he would not have needed Bailey.

Gerald McRainey:- braindead actor whose contribution to the propagation of pseudoscience consisted of starring in a short-lived TV series that utilized the prostitute tactic of manipulating viewers into believing that the central character’s communication with metaphysical entities has parallels in the real world.

 Margaret Mead:- Since pseudoscience includes conducting scientific research by unscientific methodology, that makes Margaret Mead a pseudoscientist. Her form of pseudoscience was what is usually termed experimenter bias. In interviewing adolescent Polynesian women for a thesis that became Coming of Age in Samoa, she allowed her interviewees to discern what she wanted them to say, and they obediently said it. She then published her finding that the women she interviewed were pagans who practiced free love at every opportunity, and that such behavior was the Samoan norm. Only after Mead’s death did her interviewees come forward and acknowledge that they were Catholics and that they did not want to spoil Mead’s fun by telling the truth. Because of Mead’s reputation, based on her Samoan book, she was able to persuade the American Association for the Advancement of Science to recognize parapsychology as a science, and grant it AAAS membership. Among her pseudoscientific belief were alien visitations, dowsing, psychics, including Uri Geller, “trance” phenomena, auras, communication with plants, and dreams as information from ”outside the bounds of time.” Margaret Mead was a fruitcake first class. 

Mensa:- organization of puzzle-solvers posing as intellectuals. One third of Mensa members are intelligent, one third are mediocre, and one third could take smart lessons from George W. Bush. Mensa contains the same percentage of believers in religion, the paranormal, humanoid aliens, astrology and other pseudoscience as the population at large.

Franz Anton Mesmer:- Viennese doctor who discovered that some ailments could be alleviated by mumbo jumbo that later came to be called “hypnotism” or “suggestion therapy,” that he interpreted as “animal magnetism.” An investigating committee that included Benjamin Franklin found that Mesmer’s technique had no intrinsic value, and all benefits derived from the placebo effect, but Mesmer himself was sincerely self-deluded that his methodology worked.

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory;- pseudoscientific question sheet concocted by psychoquacks to enable them to intrepret each testee’s responses to mean anything the psychoquack wishes. No two psychoquacks will interpret the same patient’s answers to the same questions in the same way.

William Moore:- morally bankrupt fiction writer who passed off a novel about invisibility and time travel as nonfiction under the title, The Philadelphia Experiment. There was no Philadelphia Experiment. Moore also wrote endorsements of the lie that an alien spacecraft crashed at Roswell, New Mexico, and intentionally suppressed the known fact that the crashed object was a surveillance ballon used to spy on the USSR.  

Malcolm Muggeridge:- brainwashed Catholic (there’s another kind?) who invented the “Mother Teresa” fantasy, much the way Lowell Thomas invented Lawrence of Arabia, by turning an obscure parasite who preyed on Calcutta slum dwellers into a “saint of the gutter,” by telling the world that she was a Father Damien equivalent. In fact, Mother Teresa was a liar, thief, and tinpot dictator who collected millions of dollars in the pretence that it would be used to feed the starving, and left it in banks to gather interest for the Catholic Church while the starving continued to starve.

National Inquirer:- supermarket tabloid devoted primarily to fictitious gossip about celebrities, but also America’s most prolific purveyor of pseudoscience. Every December National Inquirer publishes prophecies for the following year by about a dozen psychics, many of them the same ones whose prophecies a year earlier had a 100 percent failure rate.

NBC:- TV network that has long been controlled by brain amputees who lack the intelligence to grasp that “paranormal” is a euphemism for “superstitious nonsense.” In the 1980s NBC affilates carried the independently produced, In Search Of, a series that allegedly investigated “great mysteries, past and present.” As an article in Discover, 1982, reported, “In Search Of deals with them in a pretentious, semi-documentary, and fraudulent way, blatantly distorting or ignoring facts… The producers of the show apparently view [a misleading disclaimer] as a license to misinform.”  And when NBC indicated that it was preparing a series based on the Big Lie that Alison DuBois’s fairy tale autobiography was nonfiction, representaives of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), after failing to make the network executives responsible for programming realize that DuBois’s alleged powers not only do not exist but cannot exist, came away convinced that those executives were unteachables who could not grasp the basic reality that information cannot travel backward in time, as it would have to do for anyone to have knowledge of the future.

Nobel Peace Prize;- imitation gold brick that is consistently awarded to malefactors due to propagandistic media manipulation that portrays them as public benefactors. The most obscene award was to the Albanian nun, Mother Teresa, who spent her life sponging on Calcutta’s destitute, while pretending to be working for their welfare. She collected millions of dollars allegedly to feed the starving, and left it in bank accounts to collect interest for the Catholic Church while the starving continue to starve. 

Omnipotence:- At first glance, omnipotence appears to be a fantasy concept, incapable of falsification. And indeed it cannot be demonstrated directly that omnipotence does not exist. But it can be logically proven that omnipotence cannot exist. Omnipotence is the ability to do absolutely anything, including creating a number that is more than ten but less than nine. Since it can thus be proven that omnipotence does not exist, that makes it a pseudoscience concept rather than a fantasy concept. 

Omniscience:- knowledge of absolutely everything–including the future. But for any lifeform to foreknow the future, information would need to travel backward in time, in violation of the axiom that an effect cannot precede its cause. Such a violation of the laws of logic is  pseudoscience.

Hubert Pearce:- divinity student who conned Joseph Rhine that he could read minds, resulting in Rhine publishing credulous accounts of ESP tests in which Pearce had produced significantly better than chance results by cheating.

Pope Benedict XVI:- (Joseph Ratzinger—or should that be Ratzinazi?) certifiable psychopath and former Grand Inquistor who has revived the long-discredited concept of demon possession, and ordered the training of hundreds of new exorcists. Ratzinazi has cemented his absolute power by promoting the BIG LIE that condoms increase the probability of contracting AIDS. Since there is no possibility whatsoever that he believes that, he must be recognized as the most unspeakably evil mass murderer since Adolf Hitler, whose mindset, that the Führer can do anything he wishes, he shares. Ratzinazi not only preaches that his imaginary Sky Führer has predestined all non-Catholics to Hell; he praises it for doing so. Not since Hitler has anyone matched Ratzinazi’s indisputable claim to the title of the most evil, anthropocidal, anti-human, raving mad dog on earth, with Osama bin Laden  and George W. Bush fighting it out for second and third place. Any Catholic who does not demand Ratzinazi’s immediate impeachment is himself braindead. 

Pope John Paul 11:- (Karol Wojtyla) pope who may never have been diagnosed as having Down syndrome, but whose intellectual capacity was strongly suggestive of such a handicap. Wojtyla demonstrated his commitment to pseudoscience when he urged Pope Paul VI to retain the ban on birth control on the ground that changing a discredited pseudoscientific policy might encourage the masses to believe that “God was on the side of the Protestants.” As the enforcer of an insane policy that caused 60 million homicides, from starvation, malnutrition, and AIDS, Wojtyla was the most prolific mass murderer in human history.

Pope Paul V:- pseudoscientist who declared that, “the doctrine of the double motion of the earth about its axis and about the sun is false, and entirely contrary to Holy Scripture.” And these guys claim to be infallible?

prayer:- the ultimate pseudoscience. “Pray for a person, and he’ll let you pick his pocket once. Teach him to pray, and you’ve hooked a sucker for life.”

preachers:- there are two kinds of preachers: those who preach pseudo-knowledge because they are themselves brainwashed ignoramuses with no ability to disinguish fairy tales from reality, and those who are fully aware that they are parasites who sponge on the gullibility of the brainwashed because, “that’s where the money is.”

profiler:- pseudoscientist who imagines that his guesses about the perpetrator of a particular crime are more accurate and useful than those of a bartender or tealeaf reader. Except as a euphemism for a fatuous oaf with delusions of grandeur, there is no such thing as a profiler.

psychology:- collective name for a large number of incompatible theories of human behavior, such as Rogerian, Freudian, Skinnerian/Behavorist, Jungian, Adlerian, gestalt, and several others, each of which could be a useful contribution to human knowledge only if all the others are incompetent pseudoscience. In fact psychology is pseudoscience. A “knowledge of the mind” may one day exist. As of 2008 it does not.

Lobsang Rampa:- (real name, Cyril Hoskins) fantasy novelist whose pretended autobiography, A Doctor From Lhasa, became a bestseller after it was revealed that he had never been to Tibet in his life, raising the question: Just how stupid are pseudoscience believers?

Nancy Reagan;- scientifically illiterate moron who convinced her intellectually challenged husband to base America’s foreign policy on astrology.

Ronald Reagan:- B-list actor, long thought to be the stupidest President America would ever have–until George W. Bush took the title from him in a canter. Reagan may not have been the first President to believe in the pseudoscience of astrology, although he was first to base America’s foreign policy on astrology. But he was probably the first President who believed in a geocentric universe.

religion:- collective name for about 10,000 different belief systems, any one of which could be true only if all  others are imaginative fiction, and only if all science is pretentious fiction.

restless leg syndrome:- the public relations drone who concocted this pseudoscience equivalent of Barnum’s ”rose colored horse” was probably not trying to prove that no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of persons who take television commercials seriously. That was just the way it turned out.

Jospeh Rhine:- incompetent statistician whose thousands of tests of extra sensory perception in volunteer subjects first established that ESP almost certainly does not exist. Unfortunately, Rhine’s misreading of equal-to-chance results as better-than-chance led to widespread dissemination of the delusion that ESP does exist and has been demonstrated to exist. Anyone who has taken Statistics 101 can recognize at a glance that Rhine’s interpretation of his results was totally fraudulent.

Jeremy Rifkin:- author of a book called Algeny in which he denounced genetic engineering experiments on human sperm and egg cells on grounds that a presidential commision dismissed as nonsense. An article about Rifkin in Discover, August 1983, declared “Jeremy  Rifkin gives new meaning to the cliché, ‘a little learning is a dangerous thing.’ Scientists who are taken in by his nonsense should be ashamed of themselves.”

Charles Russell:- inventor of a religion called Jehovah’s Witnesses that bases its lifestyle on the delusion that, when Torah authors demanded that the blood be drained from food before eating, so that the blood could be spilled into the ground as a sacrifice to the god Yahweh, they were prohibiting the use of blood to save lives by transfusing it into accident victims, a procedure that was not even thought of until several centuries later. In several American states, Jehovah’s Witnesses  are allowed to kill their children by denying them lifesaving blood transfusions.  

Santa Claus:- fairy tale entity that children are encouraged to believe is real, even though the Santa Claus lie encourages children to believe any lie related to them  by a “usually reliable source,” and thereby conditions them to believe in Santa Claus’s adult equivalent, “God.”

Scientology:- belief system that could be true only if humans have no DNA in common with any other terrestrial lifeform, since it teaches that the first humans were brought  to earth from a planet called Arslycus, a name chosen to demonstrate the cult’s creator Ron Hubbard’s total contempt for the brain amputees capable of mistaking his confidence swindle for a religion.

Tom Selleck:- theofascist Republicanazi actor who first revealed his true self in a Magnum P.I. episode when Magnum cold-bloodly executed his friend’s murderer instead of arresting him, a scene that could never have been written into the script unless it accurately portrayed Selleck’s true moral retardation. All theofascism is pseudoscience, since it mistakes a book of fairy tales for nonfiction. But whether an individual’s philosophy is evil because he is a theofascist, or he is a theofascist because he already espoused a philosophy of evil, has never been researched.

Rod Sterling:- overrated TV writer of the 1960s whose breakout series, The Twilight Zone, was honest science fiction and made no pretence to be anything else, in his subsequent series, Night Gallery, Sterling wrote a parapsychology professor into the script, even though no such occupation existed in the real world, in order to imply that the series’ science fiction scripts were based on real cases that had been investigated by real professors and found to be unexplainable. In doing so, he opened the door for the lying prostitutes who produced Psi Factor, who took Sterling’s implication to the next level and stated categorically that their imaginative fantasises were cases from the files of an organization that did not exist. In Sterling’s favor is that he had far less control over Night Gallery than he had over The Twilight Zone, and by the series’ final season he virtually disowned it.

B. F. Skinner:- psychoquack who taught that there is no such thing as free will. Perhaps Skinner himself had no ability to make a free choice whether to behave in an ethical or a criminal manner. Most reasonable persons view the accusation that they have no such ability as unmitigated bullshit.

Joseph Smith:- American boy who, about three years after the 1816 death of author Solomon Spaulding, found Spaulding’s unpublished manuscript of a historical novel in which the imagined ”lost tribes of Israel” migrated to America and became the American Indians, and rewrote it into the semblance of nonfiction under the title, The Book of Mormon. In recent times scholars have established that twelve pages of The Book of Mormon are in Spaulding’s handwriting.

Social science:- any discipline in which two dissertations, so incompatible that for either one to be valid the other must be incompetent hogwash, can both receive Ph.D.s from the same department of the same university in the same year.

Sociobiology:- pseudoscience concocted by E. O. Wilson that could be a usful contribution to knowledge only if  history, biology, anthropology, genetics, paleontology and several other sciences are pretentious fiction.

Cardinal Francis Spellman:- purveyor of the “God” superstition based on the pretence that a book of fairy tales is nonfiction. But what makes Spellman a more worthy candidate for the Hall of Infamy than some other preachers is that, in accordance with the dogma of his cult, he preached homophobia, while simultaneously practising regular and repeated homosexual recreation himself.

Steven Spielberg:- scientifically illiterate movie director responsible for such paeans to pseudoscience as Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Poltergeist, and Taken, all of which were scripted to pander to the ignorance of conspiracy theorists. Since most of Spielberg’s movies are legitimate works of art, his endorsement of superstitious hogwash seriously undermines an otherwise illustrious reputation.

Oliver Stone:- amoral film producer who in all likelihood had no ability to grasp that contributing to the dumbing of America by reviving the long discredited “second gunman” fantasy about the JFK assassination was morally repugnant. To Stone, all that mattered was his awareness that there was a market for a movie that told conspiracy theorists what they wanted to hear, and he was no more obliged to adhere to truth or rea